# Fieldy vs Omi

> Cheapest to run at 20 hours a month: $191.88 a year (Fieldy 3) against free (Omi (Consumer Version 1)). Fieldy has 1 product on sale across 1 category. Omi has 3 products on sale across 2 categories, priced $29.99 to $179.

| | [Fieldy](https://recordercompare.com/lines/fieldy/) | [Omi](https://recordercompare.com/lines/omi/) |
|---|---|---|
| Products on sale | 1 | 3 |
| Categories | AI Recorders (1) | AI Recorders (1), Accessories (2) |
| Price range | — | $29.99 – $179 |
| Lightest | 17 g (Fieldy 3) | none published |
| Longest recording per charge | none published | none published |
| Cheapest to run at 20 hours a month | $191.88 a year (Fieldy 3) | free (Omi (Consumer Version 1)) |
| Water and dust rating | none published | none published |
| Device SDK (write your own app for the hardware) | none published | open source on 1 product |
| Developer API for your recordings | none published | public on 1 product |
| Your recordings used to train AI | not used for shared models on 1 product | only if you opt in on 1 product |
| HIPAA, as the brand states it | states compliance on 1 product | states alignment only on 1 product |
| App and cloud service | running on 1 product | running on 1 product |
| Where sold | no prices on file | Omi |

## Questions

**How many devices do Fieldy and Omi make?**
Fieldy: 1 on sale. Omi: 3 on sale.

**Which costs less to run, Fieldy or Omi?**
By the brands' own figures: $191.88 a year for Fieldy ([Fieldy 3](https://recordercompare.com/products/fieldy-3/)) and free for Omi ([Omi (Consumer Version 1)](https://recordercompare.com/products/omi/)). What a year of transcription costs at 20 hours (1,200 minutes) a month, about an hour each working day: 0 when the free tier covers it, else the cheapest plan that does, billed yearly where offered.

**How do Fieldy and Omi compare on Device SDK?**
Fieldy publishes no device sdk (write your own app for the hardware); Omi publishes open source on 1 of its 3 products. Whether the company lets developers talk to the device directly (Bluetooth protocol, firmware, an SDK) so you can build your own app on it. Published means public docs anyone can use.

**How do Fieldy and Omi compare on API?**
Fieldy publishes no developer api for your recordings; Omi publishes public on 1 of its 3 products. Whether the company offers an API to read your recordings, transcripts and summaries from your own code, and on what terms.

**How do Fieldy and Omi compare on AI training?**
Fieldy publishes not used for shared models on 1 of its 1 products; Omi publishes only if you opt in on 1 of its 3 products. What the company's own policy says about using your recordings or transcripts to train AI models. "Not used for shared models": the policy rules out general models but personalises from your data. Quoted on the product page.

**How do Fieldy and Omi compare on HIPAA?**
Fieldy publishes states compliance on 1 of its 1 products; Omi publishes states alignment only on 1 of its 3 products. Exactly what the brand claims. "Aligned" is not a certification, and a BAA is what a covered entity needs; we do not judge compliance.

**How do Fieldy and Omi compare on Service?**
Fieldy publishes running on 1 of its 1 products; Omi publishes running on 1 of its 3 products. Whether the company's app and cloud service still work for owners. Running is today's state, not a promise.

Full product lists with specs and sources: [Fieldy](https://recordercompare.com/lines/fieldy/index.md), [Omi](https://recordercompare.com/lines/omi/index.md). Page: https://recordercompare.com/vs/fieldy-vs-omi/

---
RecorderCompare compares AI pendants and voice recorders from every brand on cost to run, data handling, support and developer access, with a source for every figure. [How we compare](https://recordercompare.com/how-we-compare/). Data as of 2026-10-29.